Reading List

EDMS 738, Fall 2007: Foundations of Assessment

Prof. Robert J. Mislevy

*Almond, R.G., Steinberg, L.S., & Mislevy, R.J. (2002).  Enhancing the design and delivery of assessment systems: A four-process architecture.  Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(5) [online journal]. http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/jtla/journal/v1n5.shtml

.**Baxter, G. P., Elder, A. D., & Glaser, R., (1996). Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom.  Educational Psychologist, 31 (2), 133-140.

**Bejar, I.I., Mislevy, R.J., & Williamson, D.M. (2006). Human scoring. In I.I.Bejar, R.J. Mislevy, & D.M. Williamson (Eds.), Automated scoring of complex tasks in computer-based testing.  Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

**Clauser, B.E., Ross, L.P., Clyman, S.G., Rose, K.M., Margolis, M.J., Nungester, R.J., Piemme, T.E., Chang, L., El-Bayoumi, G., Malakoff, G.L., & Pincetl, P.S. (1997).  Development of a scoring algorithm to replace expert rating for scoring a complex performance-based assessment.  Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 345-358.

**Embretson, S.E. (1998).  A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning.  Psychological Methods, 3, 380-396.

**Hively, W., Patterson, H.L., & Page, S.H. (1968).  A "universe-defined" system of arithmetic achievement tests.  Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 275-290.

**Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.

*Mislevy, R.J. (1994).  Evidence and inference in educational assessment.  Psychometrika, 59, 439-483. Online version available as CSE Technical Report 414.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA. http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TECH414.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J. (2003). Substance and structure in assessment arguments. Law, Probability, and Risk, 2, 237-258. http://www.education.umd.edu/EDMS/mislevy/papers/Argument.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Almond, R.G., & Lukas, J.F. (2004). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design.  CSE Technical Report 632.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA. http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r632.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., Almond, R.G., Haertel, G.D., & Penuel, W.R.  (2003).  Leverage points for improving educational assessment.  In B. Means & G.D. Haertel, Designs for evaluating the effects of technology in education (pp. 149–180). New York: Teachers College Press.  Online version available as CSE Technical Report 534.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA.  http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/newTR534.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., & Almond, R.A. (2002).  Design and analysis in task-based language assessment [TBLA]. Language Assessment, 19, 477-496. Online version available as CSE Technical Report 579.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA.  http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TR579.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., & Almond, R.A. (2003).  On the structure of educational assessments [OSEA]. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3-66.  Online version available as CSE Technical Report 597.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA. http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TR597.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., Breyer, F.J., Almond, R.G., & Johnson, L. (1999).  A cognitive task analysis, with implications for designing a simulation-based assessment system.  Computers and Human Behavior, 15, 335-374. Online version available as CSE Technical Report 487.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA. http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TECH487.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., Breyer, F.J., Almond, R.G., & Johnson, L. (2002).  Making sense of data from complex assessments.  Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 363-378. Online version available as http://www.education.umd.edu/EDMS/mislevy/papers/MakingSense.pdf

*Mislevy, R.J., Wilson, M.R., Ercikan, K., & Chudowsky, N. (2003).  Psychometric principles in student assessment.  In T. Kellaghan & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 489-531). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.  Online version available as CSE Technical Report 583.  Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles:  The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA.  http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TR583.pdf

*Myford, C.M., & Mislevy, R.J. (1996). Monitoring and improving a portfolio assessment system. CSE Technical Report 402. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TECH402.pdf

*National Research Council (2002).  Advances in the sciences of thinking and learning.  Chapter 3 in Knowing what students know (pp. 59-110).  J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.).  Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Online version available at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072727/html/

  *Scalise, K., & Gifford, B. (2006).  Computer-based assessment in E-Learning: A framework for constructing “Intermediate Constraint” questions and tasks for technology platforms.  Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4 (6) [online journal]. http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/vol4/6

* indicates reading is available online to the public at large.

**indicates password protected reading, available to registered EDMS 738 students only