Using Probeware and the Internet
to Enhance Learning
 

Dr. Emily Van Zee
Angie Cole
Dienny Oropeza
Deborah Roberts

This site is under construction.


Contents: 
 

Learning with Probeware

Probeware lessons are learning experiences in which students can watch computers draw line graphs at the same time that something is happening.  The computer receives a continuous stream of data from a measuring device such as a motion detector, temperature probe, or light sensor.  The advantage of probeware lessons is that students can make immediate connections between the shape of a line graph and the phenomenon that the graph represents.  Information about the
equipment and accompanying curriculum is available at http://www.vernier.com or www.pasco.com.

Initially known as micro-computer-based laboratories (MBL) , probeware lessons also are feasible with graphing calculators (calculator-based laboratories
(CBL)).   Such real-time laboratory graphing experiences have been shown to be effective in helping elementary, middle school, high school, and college students
learn how to interpret line graphs.
 
 

Click here for more information.


 


Motion Detector

 Units       Lesson plans        Handouts         Narratives          Student work          Scoring tools     Home



 


Background Information about 
 Micro-computer based labs and Motion Detectors

     Microcomputer-Based Laboratories (MBL) are learning experiences in which students can watch computers draw line graphs at the same time that
something is happening.  The computer receives a continuous stream of data from a measuring device such as a motion detector, temperature probe, or
light sensor. Calculator-Based Laboratories (CBL) use similar measuring devices to provide data for graphing calculators.
     The advantage of MBL is that students can make immediate connections between the shape of a line graph and the phenomena that the graph
represents.  A student can move back and forth in front of a motion detector, for example, and watch a computer draw a distance versus time graph for that motion.
     Students quickly learn how to interpret specific features of a line graph.  If a student stands still in front of a motion detector, for example, the computer will draw a straight horizontal line that indicates no change in position during the duration of the measurement.  If the student moves away from the motion detector at a steady speed, however, the computer draws an upward slanting line that indicates that the distance from the detector is increasing.  The student can make the slanting line steeper by moving faster.  Students can learn to interpret a distance versus time graph by pointing to the line graph and stating where the line represents their moving quickly, standing still, or turning
around.
     Once students can interpret specific features of a line graph, they can make predictions about ways to generate a new graph. Students can look
at a distance versus time graph, for example, and move in ways to make the computer draw a similar graph.  Students also can make connections between types of graphs.  They can work with velocity versus time graphs as well as distance versus time graphs, for example.
     Microcomputer-based laboratories were developed by the Technical Education Research Center (TERC) with support from the National Science  Foundation.  Such real-time laboratory graphing experiences have been shown to be effective in helping middle school, high school, and college students learn how to interpret motion graphs (Brasell, 1987; Mokros & Tinker, 1987; Thornton, 1987).  MBL experiences also have been tried
successfully with children as young as first grade (Roberts, 1998).

Resources

Brasell, H. (1987).  The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on
learning graphic representations of distance and velocity.  Journal
of Research on Science Teaching 24, 385-395.

Mokros, J.R. & Tinker, R.F. (1987).  The impact of microcomputer-based
labs on childrens ability to interpret graphs.  Journal of Research
     on Science Teaching 24, 369-383.

Roberts, D. (1998).  Physics and first graders - What a good match!  Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
     Association, San Diego.

Thornton, R.K., (1987). Tools for scientific thinking - microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching.  Physics Education 22, 230-238.


 
 
 
 

About Us

Emily is a faculty member in the Science Teaching Center at the University of Maryland, College Park.  Angie and Dienny were undergraduate elementary education majors at the time they participated in this project.  Now they are practicing teachers.  Debi is a graduate student in science education and a fourth grade teacher.
 


If you have any comments or questions please contact

Dr. Emily H. van Zee
Associate Professor
Science Teaching Center
2226 Benjamin Building
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
(301) 405-0556
ev14@umail.umd.edu
 
 
 

Home